AI visibility: personal injury firm

Checking AI visibility by hand

Dashboards report citations. They don’t always show whether an engine recommends the firm. So I tested directly.

Practice area Personal Injury
Test window A recent test
Led by Michael O’Grady

Situation

A regional personal injury firm wanted to appear in AI answers — not just be crawled by them.

What I did

  • Upgraded content with on-page and off-page signals to encourage citations and mentions
  • Used bottom-of-funnel prompts to strengthen content on the relevant pages
  • Analyzed which features the engines pulled — experience, practice areas, location, injury types — and built the optimization around them
  • Strengthened local signals: Business Profile updates, location pages, geographic backlinks

What I tested

Logged out, in a private window, I ran about five unbranded prompts across Google AI, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity during a recent test. In about four of five, the firm and several of its partners were named as a local firm with experience.

A cleaner signal

From a different client account, measured through first-party analytics.

AI-referred users, year over year

Latest 12 months vs. the prior 12 months

40Prior 12 months243Latest 12 months+507.5%

What I’d build

A fixed prompt panel drawn from real demand data, with citations, brand mentions, and hand-tested recommendations reported as separate lines — not blended into one visibility score.

Want to know whether AI engines recommend your firm, not just cite it?

A citation means an engine used your page. A recommendation means it named you. A good report separates the two and checks the difference by hand.

Start a conversation
Client details are anonymized. Figures come from the client’s own call tracking and analytics. Modeled values are planning estimates, not revenue.